| She fought for the causes
she thought were right, starting with freedom of thought, women's rights,
secularism (she was a leading member of the National Secular Society alongside
Charles Bradlaugh), birth control, Fabian socialism and workers' rights.
Once free of Frank Besant
and exposed to new currents of thought, Annie began to question not only
her long-held religious beliefs but also the whole of conventional thinking.
She began to write attacks on the Churches and the way they controlled
people’s lives. In particular she attacked the status of the Church of
England as a state-sponsored faith.
Soon she was earning a small
weekly wage by writing a column for the National Reformer, the newspaper
of the National Secular Society. The Society stood for a secular state:
an end to the special status of Christianity. The Society allowed her to
act as one of its public speakers. Public lectures were very popular entertainment
in Victorian times. Annie was a brilliant speaker, and was soon in great
demand. Using the railway, she criss-crossed the country, speaking on all
of the most important issues of the day, always demanding improvement,
reform and freedom.
For many years Annie was
a friend of the Society’s leader, Charles Bradlaugh. It seems that they
were never lovers, but their friendship was very close indeed. Bradlaugh,
a former seaman, had long been separated from his wife. Annie lived with
Bradlaugh and his daughters, and they worked together on many issues.
Bradlaugh was an atheist
and a republican. He was working to get himself elected as MP for Northampton
to gain a better platform for his ideas.
Besant and Bradlaugh became
household names in 1877 when they published a book by the American birth-control
campaigner Charles Knowlton. It claimed that working-class families could
never be happy until they were able to decide how many children they wanted.
It suggested ways to limit the size of their families. The Knowlton book
caused great offence to the Churches, but Annie and Bradlaugh proclaimed
in the National Reformer: "We intend to publish nothing we do not think
we can morally defend. All that we publish we shall defend."
The couple were arrested
and put on trial for publishing the Knowlton book. They were found guilty,
but released pending appeal. As well as great opposition, Annie and Bradlaugh
also received a great deal of support in the Liberal press. Arguments raged
back and forth in the letters and comment columns as well as in the courtroom.
For a time, it looked as though they would be sent to prison. The case
was thrown out finally only on a technical point: the charges had not been
properly drawn up.
The scandal lost Annie her
children. Frank was able to persuade the court that she was unfit to look
after them, and they were handed over to him permanently.
Bradlaugh’s political prospects
were not damaged by the Knowlton scandal. He got himself into Parliament
at last in 1881. Because of his atheism, he refused to swear the oath of
loyalty. Although many Christians were shocked by Bradlaugh, others (like
the Liberal leader Gladstone) spoke up for freedom of belief. It took more
than six years before the whole issue was sorted out (in Bradlaugh’s favour)
after a series of by-elections and court appearances.
Meanwhile Besant built close
contacts with the Irish Home Rulers and gave them support in her newspaper
columns. These were crucial years, in which the Irish nationalists were
forming an alliance with Liberals and Radicals. Annie met the leaders of
the movement. In particular, she got to know Michael Davitt, who wanted
to mobilise the Irish peasantry through a Land War: a direct struggle against
the landowners. She spoke and wrote in favour of Davitt and his Land League
many times over the coming decades.
However, Bradlaugh's parliamentary
work gradually alienated Annie. Women had no part in parliamentary politics.
Annie was searching for a real political outlet: politics where her skills
as a speaker writer and organiser could do some real good.
|