|
Dear Mr. Chopra,
I am retd Air Force officer and Sr. Citizen. I seek your valuable advise
on the following issue:-
The Govt issued an ordinance in2006 staying sealing & demolitions
of unauthorised constructions in delhi with status quo wef 1/1/2006.
Then Govt issued another ordinance in 2007. Now does this second ordinance
is extention to the previous ordinance of 2006 or new.
Under previous ord. my (private builder's) second floor flat(costruction
beyond sanction plans) was covered under status quo effective 1/1/2006.MCD
now says that since that ord.is over I'm not entittled for same benifit
under new ord. Kindly help.Pl. do reply
Sqn Ldr Raman K jhanjee (Retd
RAMAN JHANJEE <raman_jhanjee@rediffmail.com> |
Dear Swami Mr. Rajesh Chopra,
I am very much impressed by the compilation of dates and events related
to sealing drive in Delhi, which is evident from the material I have collected
as per attachment 'sealing', from your compilations.But I have not been
able to locate any compilation of 'Live India' which clarifies the following:-
(1)- What is the sequence of demolition drive in Delhi which
started in the end of 2005?
(2)- What is now going on regarding this demolition drive?
(3)- What legal actions are being taken by weeping & wailing victims
of this demolition drive in view of the fact that other unauthorized constructions
like 1,700 unauthorized colonies etc. of Delhi are left as such and
no more being demolished?
(4)- Regarding sealing drive, September 7 & 15 Government Notification
gave relief from sealing, though the final outcome on the validity of these
notifications has to come from Supreme Court.
(5)- But how come that the people who did not give affidavit
are allowed do business by Supreme Court whereas people who gave affidavits,
in deference to authority of law, are expected by Supreme Court to close
their business?
(6)- Has any such effected person who gave affidavit has moved Supreme
Court under article 32 read with article 14 of the Constitution raising
this legally objectionable discrimination & thus highlighting this
jurisprudential enigma? If yes then what is the current fate of such proceeding?
With regards Yours truly, Hem Raj Jain
Hem Raj Jain <jain.hemraj@gmail.com> |
Email shalabh19732002@yahoo.com
Name Shalabh Sharma
Comment What u have written is absolutely right. Fears is running in
the mind of people who made their promising future way back and not to
get returns in form of Demolition and Sealing. These people started their
life while putting their hard earned money and working day & night
while giving their share to Govt. in turn to get good roads and basic amenities
instead they are getting slow poison in form of Sealing, De-sealing, Demolition
drive and lots of promises from their local leader who most of the time
are Helpless and Hopeless. Most of the time we blame ourselves that whom
we voted is not helping us in this crucial times of ours. But its not our
fault, we are simple people , living simple life and we have to choose
from what is being given in the election list. If everybody participate
in Politics. How other things will be taken care of. Its the duty of all
those politicians who are into politics for quite a long time, to see through
the situation seriously and act accordingly otherwise there are 100% chance
that most of the people will go for other means which will put our Country
back to 19th century. We can never become Super-power by demolishing our
people life and future. There is no use of Common-wealth games if the wealth
of the people of India is robbed. |
Email ashokom@rediffmail.com
Name ashok
Comment I am fully agree with your comments
all the activities of constructions are done after taking money from peoples,
without this nothing has been done. In my opinion all authorities are responsible
for this and they should also punished for their act. |
Email satya_sha2004@yahoo.com
Name satyaveer sharma
Comment Thanks for your positive feeling
about the problem of demolition a common people is facing in Delhi.I had
purchased a flat in Lal Dora area at second floor.This demolition drive
has destroyed my all worth.Now I am unable to sleep and always dreaming
the ghoast of buldozer.My builder told me that his building is constructed
as per the building bylaws of MCD.But I am not sure that in Lal Dora area
construction of flat is permitted or not.Please help me. satyaveer sharma
Assistant Director |
Email babycare2000@hotmail.com
Name DOCTOR GABA
Comment MCD TOOK ACTION AGAINST 162 ENGINEERS
RESPONSIBLE FOR UN AUTHORISED CONSTRUCTIONS HOW CAN THE LIST OF UNAUTHORISED
CONSTRUCTIONS BE TRU PICTURE ? THE LIST IS FALSE AS IT WAS PREPARED BY
BLACK LISTED ENGINEERS. I REQUEST HON\'BLE HIGH COURT TO ERASE THE LIST
PREPARED BY CORRUPT OFFICIALS OF CORRUPT DEPARTMENT IMMEDIATELY AND ORDER
FOR FRESH LIST PREPARED BY COURT COMMISSIONERS IF AT ALL ANY ACTION IS
ORDERED |
|