OBC quota reserves : SC questions govt.
New Delhi, March 7
The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved its verdict on a bunch of petitions seeking stay of the Centre’s January 2007 notification providing 27 per cent reservation for OBCs in centrally run educational institutions including IIMs and IITs from 2007-08 academic year. The main questions raised by a Bench of Mr Justices Arijit Pasayat and Lokeshwar Singh Panta pertained to why the Act should not be deferred for two years to enable the government to collect relevant data to determine the actual percentage of the OBC population and why the seats sought to be raised in IITs, AIIMS, IIMs and other institutions for accommodating the backwards should not be raised in the same proportion as for the general category students.

“Are you not creating inequality among equals by raising the seats only for the OBCs and not the general category students,” the court asked additional solicitor-general (ASG) Gopal Subramaniam, appearing for the government.

The court also asked the ASG how the government had refused to exclude the “creamy layer” from the 27 per cent reservation for OBCs in these institutions even when there was no data available with the Centre about the actual percentage of their population.

The court was not convinced with the government’s stand that the Mandal Commission recommendations based on the 1931 caste-based census was relied upon to determine the 27 per cent quota. The Bench said the 1931 census data had become irrelevant.

The court said if the “creamy layer” formula was applicable to the OBCs in government jobs as per the provisions of Article 16(4) of the Constitution, why the same should not be applicable to them in admissions to education institutions under Article 15. The court grilled the government counsel on the aspects of “economic backwardness” vis-à-vis “social and educational backwardness”, pointing out that the backwardness could not necessarily be determined on the basis of a class, which might be educationally backward but financially well off.

However, it made clear that in this context that it was not referring to the Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Schedule Tribes (STs) for whom an express provision had been made in the Constitution because of their caste-based oppression for centuries, but the same caste factor could not be applied to the OBCs,

A battery of senior advocates, led by Fali S. Nariman and P.P. Rao, appearing for various petitioners, organisations of anti-quota students and doctors of AIIMS and Maulana Azad Medical College, sought stay on the implementation of the new Act. However, the court was not convinced. It wanted to know how would the Government ensure that the rights of the general category candidates in the increased seats were not adversely affected.



Press Information 

Copyright © 1998-2001 Live India Internet Services! All rights reserved
( The Trade Marks Act, 1999, No. 01403083. User Since : 01/04/1997 )

Legal Information
All rights reserved. No part of this publication and other sites of under liveindia.com may be transmitted or reproduced in any form or by any means without prior permission from the publisher Live India Internet Services or Rajesh Chopra, L.C.Premium Cables, 1826, Amar Nath 2nd Building, Bhagirath Palace Delhi - 110006, India. Liveindia.com or Mr.Rajesh Chopra is not responsible for any wrong information under this site, For confirmation of any information it is recomended that you can reconfirm from yours end.

Current Topics and News From LiveIndia.com
Privacy Policy for LiveIndia.Com